GAMEBOOMERS provides you with all the latest PC adventure computer games information, forum, walkthroughs, reviews and news.
GB Reviews Latest & Upcoming Adventure Games GB Annual Game Lists GB Interviews

BAAGS

GB @ acebook

GB @ witter

About Us
Walkthroughs free games galore Independent Games World of Adventure Patches Game Publishers & Developers GameBoomers Store
Big Fish Games Homepage    
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#121093 - 08/30/06 01:43 AM What length of game would you consider too short
Skye Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 12/21/05
Posts: 294
Loc: British Columbia, Canada
In my readings of reviews on games that have been released lately, I have noticed that some people comment on the game being too short.

I know that for everyone it will be different but what length of play time makes you decide a game is too short?
_________________________
Indie Developer of Scavenger Hunter
The Replayable Adventure Game!
Released Dec 16/06! Order Now at:
http://www.Sagewood-Software.ca

Top
#121094 - 08/30/06 02:28 AM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Mad Online   content
True Blue Boomer

Registered: 11/21/00
Posts: 23531
Loc: United Kingdom
Hi smile

The length of a game isn't as important to me as the amount of enjoyment that can be had - and how quickly a game can be completed will anyway vary greatly from player to player ....

But if I personally had paid full whack for a game and then finished it in 10 hours or less, I would certainly be questioning value for money wave
_________________________
Time : The Most Precious Commodity

Top
#121095 - 08/30/06 08:13 AM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
hammer Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 03/12/04
Posts: 837
Loc: New York
I remember back in the day when I bought Space Quest 3, I finished it in about 3-4 hours, and I was very unhappy about it. However, it was a very fun game. smile

Top
#121096 - 08/30/06 09:11 AM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
MrLipid Offline
Addicted Boomer

Registered: 12/30/00
Posts: 1946
Loc: Land of 10,000 Lakes
I've played short games that felt way too long and long games that felt way too short.

Key word: felt.

If a game fails to engage my interest, it's too long. If a game captures my interest, it's too short.

Much less interested in how many hours of gameplay than in how intense the experience.

Top
#121097 - 08/30/06 09:14 AM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Sassafras Offline
Addicted Boomer

Registered: 07/15/02
Posts: 1015
Loc: Ormond By The Sea ,Florida
I finished both Delaware St John games in about 3-4 hrs apiece. WAY too short! I consider a game too short if it takes me less than a week to finish , playing maybe 10 hrs total.

Top
#121098 - 08/30/06 12:41 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Legolas813 Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 02/17/05
Posts: 378
Loc: Florida
If a game is under around 15 hours, I will definitely consider it to be too short.

Top
#121099 - 08/30/06 01:54 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Belgar Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 08/29/06
Posts: 138
Loc: Belgium
Depends what one means by short? I remember the days when I had or was no internet and playing Indiana Jones Fate of Atlantis or 7th guest or bad mojo (remember these??) .. I got stuck for months at one spot without any means to look for a walkthrough. That to me was long.
Right now, many people seem to prioritize graphics over story,...
To me a good game lenght is a game that when it is finished leaves you wanting more .. or leaves with that "wow" feeling.

Top
#121100 - 08/30/06 03:00 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Raj Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 06/10/02
Posts: 336
Loc: Portland Oregon USA
I absolutely agree with the people who have said that it is much more important how long a game feels rather than how many hours you log in gameplay.

That being said, Critical Path (an interactive movie/"game") could be finished in perhaps a little over an hour. The game consisted of nine parts and each was a single puzzle (one was a maze), and so even the trial and error puzzles didn't take long. The maze took the longest time, so I guess one could get stuck there for a while.

It was fun while I was playing it, but an hour or so of entertainment really is too short to pay much money for. I got it in a multi-game trade.
_________________________
"Learning to fly... and I'm trying to try..." Ritchie Havens (Tex Murphy: Overseer)

Top
#121101 - 08/30/06 03:09 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
MrLipid Offline
Addicted Boomer

Registered: 12/30/00
Posts: 1946
Loc: Land of 10,000 Lakes
If you know what you're doing, Safecracker 2006 can be completed in less than an hour.

And I would still consider it one of the best games I've played in the past few years.

Go figure. wink

Top
#121102 - 08/30/06 04:19 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
margiesam Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 12/31/04
Posts: 153
Loc: Toronto
I agree with Sassafras, I found Delaware ST John games far too short. The game should last at least one week, approximately 15 hours of playing time. I get really disappointed when a game is too short, I feel that I did not get my money's worth.
I am definitely hesitant at getting the next Delaware ST John's game.

Top
#121103 - 08/30/06 05:06 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Carrie Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 06/30/01
Posts: 930
Loc: San Francisco area, Calif.
Hmmmm...I've never timed my gameplay in hours... never quantified it... just dived in. But I'll try to break it down.

Too short a game, I'd estimate would be 1 sitting of about 6 or less hours.

Normal gameplay time for me is, maybe a month's worth of weekends, a handful of hours each? duh I'd consider that to be about the right amount of time. Depending on the difficulty of the game, maybe I'll spend 6 weeks, or like Belgar, I could be stuck for months. When I'm in the game for a long time, that means I like it (I'd 'bail' if I didn't). I do try to savor the good ones... that is, stretch out the time I play.

I always expect to get my money's worth, and I'll 'second' what Mad said about questioning value for money if the gameplay is too short... even a fun, good game.

I think we may all be saying --pretty much-- the same things in a variety of different ways, with an emphasis on quality rather than duration; and consideration for our over-BAAGS-stressed budgets.

It's hard to quantify hours of play, value & game quality. If it were me, I'd make the best game I could that would engage a player for a long time... and keep the cost under $20 USD... just what I would expect to get when I buy a game.

Hey Skye, hope you're not sorry you asked! woozy
_________________________
catrub

Top
#121104 - 08/30/06 07:15 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Albert Offline
Addicted Boomer

Registered: 11/21/99
Posts: 1066
Loc: Glennville, Ga., USA
I agree with a lot that has been said here. To me, its a question of value. An hour of joy is worth a lot more than ten of agony. I've paid $50 for games that were worth every penny and more. I've paid $20 for games that were pure junk. I've played freeware games that I thought were pretty good. As has been said, the more I like it, the longer I want it to last. The length of the game, or the cost, is secondary to the joy per hour factor. I don't care too much if a game is short, as long as the price matches. Think rental videos. I'd guess about one or two dollars per hour would be about right. Except maybe the true Greats. I'd pay a premium for them.

Albert

Top
#121105 - 08/30/06 09:30 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
dragonseyes Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 03/27/06
Posts: 457
Loc: louisiana
i like the length of syberia the first one, i like games that keep me interested, if i have spent alot on it i would prefer it to be long as well as good, i like the dracula series as well, rolleyes to me scratches was a good game but it was short, eek

Top
#121106 - 08/30/06 11:28 PM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
Merlin Offline
Settled Boomer

Registered: 06/02/06
Posts: 515
Loc: London, UK
Well, I believe secret files of tunguska is meant to be in the region of around 20 to 25 hours of gameplay. Now that's long for an adventure, if it's true. I have never finished a game in just a few hours. A few days, yes.
Some people read a whole book in a day where it takes many of us much longer. You could go out on the town for an evening, spend as much or more than the cost of a game, and perhaps not have as much fun as staying in and playing a game. And then if you haven't finished it, you can play more the next night. happydance Unless the game is ridiculously easy or very badly made, I generally don't have a problem with game length.

Top
#121107 - 08/31/06 11:41 AM Re: What length of game would you consider too short
SkeeterUK Offline
Addicted Boomer

Registered: 09/07/04
Posts: 1393
Loc: United Kingdom
Well personally for an adventure game it should be no less than 25 hours to complete. I like long games like kotor, and TLJ and gk3.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


Who's Online
Key: Admin Global Mod Mod Staff  )
12 registered (connie, Coreoverload, Pandora, bermag45, kjos, luv2travel, mj2c, Ole, GBC, Mad), 79 Guests and 12 Spiders online.
Newest Members
Cabb, Veilant, tookiebgirl12, Adam_B, Polikolp
8542 Registered Users