CSI Hard Evidence
#269248
01/26/08 07:40 PM
01/26/08 07:40 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,366
Sacramento, CA USA
Betty Lou
OP
Adept Boomer
|
OP
Adept Boomer
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,366
Sacramento, CA USA
|
Well, I sure enjoyed these 5 cases....however, was anyone else as disappointed as I was in the "bonus's" awarded at the end of each case? What the heck were those ? Bummer! When I earn or win a prize, I would like it to be something of substance, like I would have been delighted with another short case to solve...how about you? Love, Betty Lou
I am 'the HAT lady"! and "who loves ya BABY?!"
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: Betty Lou]
#269252
01/26/08 07:51 PM
01/26/08 07:51 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,541
Brazil
Phoebe
Addicted Boomer
|
Addicted Boomer
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,541
Brazil
|
Hey Betty
I also did not like of bonus, and i not enjoyed very much the cases. I must to tell that i enjoyed much more the cases of Csi: Dimensions of Murder.
Yes,though i go through the valley of deep shade,i will have no fear of evil;for you are with me, your rod and your support are my comfort. Salmo23:4
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: Phoebe]
#269287
01/26/08 08:46 PM
01/26/08 08:46 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,403
Crazy Town
TLC
BAAG Specialist
|
BAAG Specialist
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,403
Crazy Town
|
Betty Lou, I agree. I was disappointed in the bonus but knew it would be what it was, since every CSI game has the same bonus.  Who wants to see promos and pictures of a game that you just played? Not me! And why would the developer's think we do?  I have to say, I enjoyed the previous games more than this one. 
<3 I am in love with Norman Reedus/Daryl Dixon <3
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: Betty Lou]
#270479
01/29/08 09:08 AM
01/29/08 09:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,264
Greece
Volkana
Addicted Boomer
|
Addicted Boomer
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,264
Greece
|
Hi guys... I agree with Betty and all of you. It was very bad bonus material... I enjoy too the previous games more than this one.I think that the cases in this game were not so interesting and difficult as the others from the old games. Cheers
Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: Volkana]
#271854
01/31/08 11:14 PM
01/31/08 11:14 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,372
PA, USA
misa
Addicted Boomer
|
Addicted Boomer
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,372
PA, USA
|
Finished this and already into 3 Dimensions of Murder. This is my first foray into the CSI games and I really enjoyed Hard Evidence. My only complaint is that I wish there were more than 5 cases per game! Okay, actually another complaint, I wish it was a little more challenging. The only challenging thing really was being limited in movement and missing a few hotspots (especially in case 5). I did learn something from Hard Evidence though which I had been wondering for awhile but never bothered to look up. My DH is an identical twin and I had always assumed that since they share the same DNA, they would share the same fingerprints. Case 5 proved me wrong! 
Last edited by misa; 01/31/08 11:16 PM.
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: misa]
#271862
01/31/08 11:56 PM
01/31/08 11:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 512
Pennsylvania, USA
PMcOuntry
Settled Boomer
|
Settled Boomer
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 512
Pennsylvania, USA
|
I loved this installment of the CSI series, but the 5th case had a crucial mistake in it's storyline which irked me. Identical twins/triplets, etc. DO NOT have the same DNA. I know this for a fact because I am a Criminal Justice student and we covered DNA in one of our classes.
Patricia
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: PMcOuntry]
#271887
02/01/08 04:05 AM
02/01/08 04:05 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,453
Texas
nickie
Grand wizard of high mucky muck
|
Grand wizard of high mucky muck
Adept Boomer
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,453
Texas
|
I don't think that's correct Patricia. As far as I know, identical twins have identical DNA, unless there is the very rare mutation of the egg after the division. The difference between them is that it is expressed differently in the phenotypes (like fingerprints). Fraternal twins would have the same similarity of DNA as any other sibling though, not identical. I haven't looked at that stuff in years though, so if you have a source saying otherwise, I'd be really interested in hearing about it, if you felt like pming me
"How could drops of water know themselves to be a river? Yet the river flows on."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: nickie]
#271955
02/01/08 10:16 AM
02/01/08 10:16 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,372
PA, USA
misa
Addicted Boomer
|
Addicted Boomer
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,372
PA, USA
|
Patricia and nickie. This is fascinating. I did find this article from 2004.
Last edited by misa; 02/01/08 10:17 AM.
|
|
|
Re: CSI Hard Evidence
[Re: Bristol]
#272990
02/03/08 12:16 PM
02/03/08 12:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 512
Pennsylvania, USA
PMcOuntry
Settled Boomer
|
Settled Boomer
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 512
Pennsylvania, USA
|
Okay... I admit I was wrong. I just went back through an old text book (yes I keep them) and found the statemet (paraphrasing): Everyone has unique DNA, EXCEPT IDENTICAL TWINS... however, fraternal twins DO NOT have the same DNA. Meanwhile, I contacted my professor and he replied with this answer: With DNA technology changing, recently a question has arisen on this issue. Right now we are getting two different answers on this, but you are right, that is what I told you [twins DO NOT have the same DNA]. Now, I am not so sure. I have questioned a few others on this and the responses vary. Also, I hated the bonus material! Did anyone get all 5 cases 100% to get the last bonus item on the table? I didn't get that, what was it?
Last edited by PMcOuntry; 02/04/08 01:24 PM.
Patricia
|
|
|
|
|
acebook
witter
