Posted By: noelbruton
Do Sequels Deliver? - 09/01/08 02:10 PM
Hi all,
Now that I've got a little time on my hands (can you guess why?), I've been reading through the list of anticipated games at this post and looking for patterns. Seems like the most anticipated is Black Mirror 2, followed by Still Life 2, Gray Matter, Tunguska 2 and Dead Mountaineers Hotel. Then there's another batch, the next Sherlock Holmes, the next Nancy Drew, the next Runaway. Then, there's a shedload of also-rans, including, sadly, our own dear 'Rhiannon' :-( . No matter - I'm sure the publishers will soon be trying to change that :-). Finally, there is a cluster of not-yet-announced-but-we-wish-they-were sequels.
Strikes me that sequels figure big time on this list. So, what is it about sequels? And isn't the sequel a bit of a double-edged sword? On the one hand, there is the comfort of the familiar, while on the other the risk that it may not meet elevated expectations that it has to be better than the original? Will you buy the sequel because of its predecessor, or not buy it because you didn't play the predecessor and don't want to come in half way through?
So - 'Syberia' aside, obviously because it was stunning :-) - do sequels always deliver for you?
Cheers
Noel Bruton
Arberth Studios
Watch out for 'Rhiannon - Curse of the Four Branches' - coming unnervingly soon
Now that I've got a little time on my hands (can you guess why?), I've been reading through the list of anticipated games at this post and looking for patterns. Seems like the most anticipated is Black Mirror 2, followed by Still Life 2, Gray Matter, Tunguska 2 and Dead Mountaineers Hotel. Then there's another batch, the next Sherlock Holmes, the next Nancy Drew, the next Runaway. Then, there's a shedload of also-rans, including, sadly, our own dear 'Rhiannon' :-( . No matter - I'm sure the publishers will soon be trying to change that :-). Finally, there is a cluster of not-yet-announced-but-we-wish-they-were sequels.
Strikes me that sequels figure big time on this list. So, what is it about sequels? And isn't the sequel a bit of a double-edged sword? On the one hand, there is the comfort of the familiar, while on the other the risk that it may not meet elevated expectations that it has to be better than the original? Will you buy the sequel because of its predecessor, or not buy it because you didn't play the predecessor and don't want to come in half way through?
So - 'Syberia' aside, obviously because it was stunning :-) - do sequels always deliver for you?
Cheers
Noel Bruton
Arberth Studios
Watch out for 'Rhiannon - Curse of the Four Branches' - coming unnervingly soon